Tajika A, Ogawa Y, Takeshima N, Hayasaka Y, Furukawa TA. Replication and contradiction of highly cited research papers in psychiatry: 10-year follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. 2015; Available online July 2015: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.1113.143701. Little J, Higgins JPT, Ioannidis JPA, Moher D, Gagnon F, Von Elm E, et al. STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)-an extension of the STROBE Statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:597e608 The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement was developed to help biomedical researchers report randomised controlled trials (RCTs) transparently. We have developed an extension to the CONSORT 2010 Statement for social and psychological interventions (CONSORT-SPI 2018) to help behavioural and social scientists report these studies transparently. Methods Wilson DB. Comment on ‘developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials’. J Exp Criminol. 2013;9:375–7.

Table - Hallway Table - Hallway Console Table - IKEA Console Table - Hallway Table - Hallway Console Table - IKEA

If you’re interested in neat and smart solutions, a console table is a must-have piece. It offers massive flexibility and can easily take on multiple roles throughout its stay in your home. Authors should provide a balanced discussion of the strengths and limitations of the trial and its results. Authors should consider issues related to risks of bias, precision of effect estimates, the use of multiple outcomes and analyses, and whether the intervention was delivered and taken up as planned. Discussion: generalisability Item 21: generalisability (external validity, applicability) of the trial findings Davidson KW, Goldstein M, Kaplan RM, et al. Evidence-based behavioral medicine: what is it and how do we achieve it? Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(3):161–71. Extension for within person trials—Identification as a within person randomised trial in the title.For each primary and secondary outcome, results for each group, and the estimated effect size and its precision (such as 95% confidence interval) Results of any other analyses performed, including subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses, distinguishing pre-specified from exploratory

Console Tables - Living Room Furniture | The Range Console Tables - Living Room Furniture | The Range

American Educational Research Association. Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educ Res. 2006;35(6):33–40. In addition to generating a truly random sequence (Item 8a), researchers should conceal the sequence to prevent foreknowledge of the intervention assignment by persons enrolling and assigning participants. Otherwise, recruitment and allocation could be affected by knowledge of the next assignment. Authors should report whether and how allocation was concealed [ 80, 81]. When allocation was concealed, authors should describe the mechanism and how this mechanism was monitored to avoid tampering or subversion (e.g. centralised or 'third-party' assignment, automated assignment system, sequentially numbered identical containers, sealed opaque envelopes). While masking (blinding) is not always possible, allocation concealment is always possible. Methods: randomisation—implementation Item 10: who generated the random allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who assigned participants to interventionsAppelbaum M, Cooper H, Kline RB, Mayo-Wilson E, Nezu AM, Rao SM. Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: the APA publications and communications board task force report. Am Psychol. 2018;73(1):3 Shamseer L, Hopewell S, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF. Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal ‘instructions to authors’ in 2014. Trials. 2016;17(1):301. Due to the extensive range of wood types we supply, our Furniture will sometimes come with specific care instructions. Please read these carefully and adhere to these instructions to get the most out of your furniture.

Consort Table - Only Oak Furniture -On Sale Now Consort Table - Only Oak Furniture -On Sale Now

Fraser MW, Galinsky MJ, Richman JM, Day SH. Intervention research: developing social programs. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Altman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, Oxman AD, Moher D for the CONSORT and Pragmatic Trials in Healthcare (Practihc) group. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 2008; 337;a2390. [3] Betz CL. Adoption of CONSORT statements for randomized control trials published in the Journal of Pediatric Nursing. J Pediatr Nurs. 2011;26(3):177-8. PMID: 21601140 Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trial. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement was developed to help authors report randomised controlled trials (RCTs) [ 1]. It has improved the quality of reports in medicine [ 2, 3, 4, 5], and has been officially endorsed by over 600 journals and prominent editorial groups [ 6]. A smaller number of journals have implemented CONSORT—particularly its extension statements—as a requirement for the manuscript submission, peer-review, and editorial decision-making process [ 6, 7]. There are extensions of the CONSORT Statement ( http://www.consort-statement.org/extensions) for specific trial designs [ 8, 9, 10, 11], types of data (e.g. patient-reported outcomes, harms, and information in abstracts) [ 12, 13, 14], and interventions [ 15, 16, 17].International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Joint statement on public disclosure of results from clinical trials 2017. Full size table Item 3b: important changes to methods after trial commencement (such as eligibility criteria), with reasons For each outcome in a trial, authors should report summary results for all analyses, including results for each trial group and the contrast between groups, the estimated magnitude of the difference (effect size), the precision or uncertainty of the estimate (e.g. 95% confidence interval or CI), and the number of people included in the analysis in each group. The p value does not describe the precision of an effect estimate, and authors should report precision even if the difference between groups is not statistically significant [ 46]. For categorical outcomes, summary results for each analysis should include the number of participants with the event of interest. The effect size can be expressed as the risk ratio, odds ratio, or risk difference and its precision (e.g. 95% CI). For continuous outcomes, summary results for each analysis should include the average value and its variance (e.g. mean and standard error). The effect size is usually expressed as the mean difference and its precision (e.g. 95% CI). Summary results are often more clearly presented in a table rather than narratively in text. CONSORT-SPI item 17a: indicate availability of trial data The process of establishing an ethically and scientifically approved trial sample size needs to be noted and justified. Such information needs to provide evidence of the statistical power of the sample population under study. Furthermore, the randomization protocol of the sample population into the intervention and the control groups must be noted. Trials that follow a blinding protocol need to ensure the following: how such blinding was done, who knew about the blinding, was blinding initiated from the start of the trial, among other details. This is to ensure that any potential bias in the results is identified and accounted for.[ 3]