The Starchild Skull -- Genetic Enigma or Human-Alien Hybrid?

Product Information

According to the HuffPost, in a 2013 article about Lloyd Pye and his work related to the Starchild Skull, “it takes some cojones to take a stand on the existence of aliens.” Nevertheless, mainstream science continues to argue that the skull belongs to that of a human child with congenital hydrocephalus, fobbing off alien arguments as pseudoscience.

Smith, B. et. al. "An anatomical study of a duplication 6p based on two sibs." American Journal of Medical Genetics. 3 Jun. 2005, Volume 20, Issue 4: 649-663. The Starchild Skull is a 900 year old bone skull found in Mexico in the 1930s. It is most famous for the attention it attracts among alien enthusiasts, who believe it may be at least partly alien. [It should be noted that the Starchild Project does not assert it is an alien, however we do not exclude this possibility entirely.]The Skull has been tested and examined by various medical and scientific experts since 1999, and no human condition or deformity has yet been identified that can explain its wide variety of abnormal characteristics. A Starchild Skull replica was made by Joe Taylor at the Mt. Blanco Fossil Museum. A mold was made by carefully applying latex to the interior and exterior of the Skull and talcum was applied to the finished latex mold to assist removal . After curing, the mold was used to create an exact replica and identical coloring was applied.Human chewing muscles attach from the lower jaw to the side of the skull, extending over a large area of the skull. The starchild’s chewing muscles The chewing muscles cover only about half as much of the skull.

The fascinating aspect about this 900 year old skull that was located 100 miles Southwest of Chihuahua, Mexico known as the “Copper Canyon,” is its physical characteristics. During the initial stages of the research a small sample of the skull was needed for DNA analysis. It was soon discovered that the physical characteristics of the skull were extraordinary. This is what was discovered: Scientist and amateur debunkers have come out harshly against the idea that the skull represents tangible evidence of alien visitation, or in the case of the claim of it being an alien-human hybrid, ancient alien genetic manipulation of humans. Debunkers claim that not enough tests have been run and demand that the anonymous geneticist at the secret lab who has been responsible for most of the testing should come forth and be known. Others dismiss anything to do with extraterrestrials out of hand and say that the simplest explanation is often the correct explanation, that the skull belonged to an unfortunate human, a dwarf suffering from massive deformities or a child with a case of Hutchinson-Gilford Syndrome or simple Hydrocephaly. The initial report of the Starchild anomalies given to the staff of The Field Reports was extensive. What remained a central point in our examinations were two factors: In 2010, the Starchild Project secured access to a highly sophisticated DNA lab capable of recovering non-human DNA. Preliminary DNA testing found that a significant percentage of the DNA in the skull is not human. If verified, this finding would indicate that the skull belongs to a new species. Skeptic's Answer:The actual brain tissue was the same size as a human, but it looked bigger because of Hydrocephaly. Fluid inside the brain pushed it outwards and made it look bigger, but it was "hollow" (filled with fluid) inside.Skeptic's Answer:It is a child of about 5 years old, and possibly had Progeria, which causes dental problems.

The FOXP2 gene fragment reveals 56 differences which confirms the Starchild Skull is not a human being. Problem with the Answer:It didn't have any of these conditions as proven by X-Rays and CT scans, andthe Starchild Skull is not a fossil. (Fossils are over 10,000 years old, the Starchild Skull is only 900 years old, reference the C14 dating report Not until 2010 was a further round of ancient DNA testing done with more sophisticated technology, wherein nuclear DNA was recovered for the first time. A sample was sent to the US National Institute of Health and run through their BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) process for comparison to all other known DNA held in their database. The result? Some was similar to human DNA; some was not. Then, in 2011, mitochondrial DNA was recovered and, similarly, run through the BLAST process. Again, some was found to be similar to human DNA but large amounts were not. Were these results to be corroborated, it would show that the Starchild Skull belonged to an undiscovered species. At our last meeting, in Sept 2013, Lloyd explained to me that Matthew Brownstein, following his own research, proposed that they form an agreement and a company as a vehicle for furthering the goals of the Starchild Project. Although Lloyd didn’t go into minute detail about the agreement, he did tell me of the formation of an agreement between himself, Amy (his ex-wife), Ray and Melanie Young and Matthew Brownstein. The reasons I am explaining this will become clear below. Alien skull' star attraction at Leeds extra-terrestrial conference". Yorkshire Evening Post. 27 June 2009 . Retrieved 13 August 2011.At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exist countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

Mason County, Virginia, 1821: Seven skulls found, so large they could easily fit over a man's head; with double rows of teeth on the upper jaw, and but two solitary teeth on the lower jaw. Roberts, Alice (2015). The Incredible Unlikeliness of Being: Evolution and the Making of Us. Quercus. pp.87–88. ISBN 978-1623658083. As with the falsified claims to the DNA testing showing abnormal FOXP2 genes (the lead investigator, Chase, literally called the NIH Human Genome Research Institute and they had no record of the reported genetics test from 2012) We know that the person who reported these findings also falsified his profession as he was not a geneticist but a virologist. We question many of the previous findings that do not have explicit proof of the tests conducted, including VERIFIABLE tests done by credentialed professionals. Extroidinary claims require extroidinary proof. We were so hoping to find extroidinary proof, but as you can read, what we had was a deformed Skull of a human child that had been the source of much speculation.While a tiny amount of survivable mutations are possible in FOXP2, every one that occurs presents debilitating or life-threatening consequences, so up to this point in time none have been passed on to the general population of humans. This means in the vast, vast majority of humans, the FOXP2 master gene is absolutely identical. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis, which discovered highly unusual microscopic fibers inside the bone of the Skull The Starchild Skull’s physical size is of a small adult in the range of 5 feet tall, or an average 12-year-old, which means its brain should be about 1200 cubic centimeters. An average adult has 1400 c.c. of brain. Instead the Starchild has 1600 c.c. of brain.