Mating

Product Information

As ham-handed as some of the literary opinions of Tsau's architect, Nelson Denoon tend to be (he gets poetry humorously wrong, and his views on Shakespeare seem to miss any literary dimension of the plays), it's hard not to admire his energy and his equal commitment to physical and intellectual tasks, the deltas where these tributaries of sweat come together.

Socialism, he declares, is like “knitting with oars” and adds: “show me a socialist country and I will show you a net food importer. The volunteer fleet mechanic at the hospital is a “beautiful” young Dutch pacifist, Bruns: he “belonged to some sect.She wonders if Denoon is deceiving her with his new mysticism and she conspires for him to spend a night with the “beautiful Bronwen Something, a State Department intern. She adds her “own emendation, a less pessimistic one”—the “jagged and belated but definite rise of women into positions of political authority. She also has a yen for Nelson Denoon, a charismatic intellectual who is rumored to have founded a secretive and unorthodox utopian society in a remote corner of the Kalahari--one in which he is virtually the only man. The unnamed protagonist of Mating is an American thirty-something nutritional anthropologist living in Botswana in the 1980s. I would have made a wonderful marxist if I’d been born into it, probably, which is the only way it could have stuck.

Norman Rush is the author of four works of fiction: Whites , a collection of stories, and three novels, Subtle Bodies, Mating, and Mortals. She recoils: “But I just said that I knew about this because it had been in the Rand Daily Mail, and it was more than sad. If you were a Literature or Philosophy major who loved college/grad school and secretly miss the pomposity and the naivete, then you're going to love this book, because it puts you back in the land of discovery again. If you're looking for mindless entertainment, this isn't the book, but if you're ready for a literary adventure, don't miss Mating. Phipps said he was wondering “why everyone isn’t always talking about this book, why we have not raised great statues of Rush and/or the unnamed protagonist in our parks and squares.When I read the novel as a student in 1991, in a beautiful Knopf hardback that has endured the years, it struck me as a quirky, singular handbook of how two bookish, voluble adults might sustain a lengthy relationship. Rush's novel is a fairly unrelenting slog - 477 pages of text rarely broken by paragraphing, let alone by the sweet relief of dialogue - narrated by an unlikeable and frankly unreliable woman who meets a guy she doesn't even really seem to like at a party and then stalks him across a desert because she has absolutely nothing better to do with her life. Women dominate Tsau’s governing council; they are deeded their plots and homes; and, defying tradition, inheritance is channeled through daughters, not sons. Oh, yes, when it comes to a combination of intellect and good looks, Nar tells us flatly, "My preference is always for hanging out with the finalists. She arrives in Tsau severely dehydrated but triumphant: “How many women could have done this, women not supported by large male institutions or led by male guides?

I don't know - when I read it, it rang true, particularly the main character's relationship with her ambitions, her strange relationship, and her body. She steps off the page in a very distinctive way, and eventually we learn a thousand things about her, things that only novels can impart. where he had earned a living as an antiquarian bookseller, to Gaborone, Botswana’s capital, to be co-directors of the Peace Corps in that country. Anther sign of being in equilibrium must be repeated feelings of equanimity about things that would normally bother you. Um, I feel you Rachel, but another literary dealbreaker might just be not being able to read the book at all due to the arcane vocabulary!Bruns” anchored Rush’s 1986 collection, Whites, which featured six stories set in Botswana and was shortlisted for the Pulitzer Prize.

Frequently, when writing a review, I'll provide an unnamed narrator with a name but I will respect Mr.

It helps that I knew American anthropologists in Botswana of whom I'm reminded by the central couple. It’s a towering standard that Rush, too, has met in his intoxicating treatise about romance, community-building and causes lost and won. He’s a luminary in anthropology who reviles academia, a figure who has managed the elusive feat of putting theory into practice, a man at the level of “Paulo Freire or Ivan Illich, but nonreligious, totally, therefore not dismissable as a mystic. I love the crazed self-analysis about childbearing, and how that suggestion on his part in the end is what makes her leave.